On Fri, 08 Jun 2007, David Glasser wrote:
> On 6/8/07, Daniel Rall <email@example.com> wrote:
> >Because both RA layers handle DAV access, they currently can't
> >co-exist in the same client.
> Is this just the result of the current implementation of ra_loader, or
> is this a policy decision for a good reason? I mean, it's not like we
> don't already have a per-server config file.
I believe it's just a side-effect of the current RA loader
implementation. IIRC, people have looked at changing this a few times
in the past, but didn't get any traction. The RA loader isn't a ton
of code -- it should be pretty easy to just toss the existing one an
re-write it from scratch, if need be.
Received on Sat Jun 9 00:03:38 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored