Re: apr_dbd vs. direct sqlite (was Re: searchable revprops?)

On 5/15/07, Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> wrote:
> "Garrett Rooney" <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
>
> > apr_dbd is rather new (i.e. not in apr-util 0.9.x), and doesn't solve
>
> People are still using that? 1.2's been out for a while... I
> understand we can't *break* people using 0.9.x when they upgrade
> to new versions, but who says the *new* features have to be
> usable with the old stuff?

Well, we've supported the APR 0.9.x line (and even encouraged its use
over the 1.x line by only shipping 0.9.x binaries) for some time, for
binary compatibility reasons. Now there's no reason that can't
change, but if we're going to make new features depend on things like
APR 1.x then we need to make that very clear to users.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 15 22:44:39 2007