Re: [PATCH] libsvn_fs_util: New library to reuse FSFS and BDBfunctions
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Daniel Rall wrote:
> >> I'm actually suprised that the entire locking subsystem isn't shared -
> >> isn't the implementation absolutely identical?
> > If they once were, they seem to have diverged somewhat. It would be
> > nice to share what code we can between'em, though.
> Lock implementations are different. One uses flat files in a hashed
> directory (FSFS), the other uses BDB tables.
Would it make sense to share the interface? Or would that add
unnecessary additional complexity?
Received on Wed Apr 4 19:01:10 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev