Peter Lundblad wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato writes:
>> So maybe there's no compat mode other than for the client, in the absense of
>> the special flag, to raise SVN_ERR_UNSUPPORTED_FEATURE. Or we could do our
>> best, only raising that error if a) the server won't support --copies-only
>> and b) a non-verbose log request was made.
>>
>
> I thinkn this is one of the cases where the RA layers shouldn't try to
> emulate the API, but let the caller decide what to do.
That's fine with me. I do have another concern, though -- a server that
doesn't recognize --copies-only isn't going to just say, "I don't recognize
--copies-only." It's going to send a potentially massive stream of log
information down the wire to a client who ultimately doesn't want it.
That's kinda bad, right?
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Tue Apr 3 16:49:05 2007