On 4/1/07, D.J. Heap <djheap@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> I've attached a thrown-together-in-5-mins minmal patch (not
> style-formatted correctly, no doc updates, didn't change the init
> function names, etc) that appears to resolve the issue from inital
> testing. Does the basic approach look viable? If so, I'll refine it
> and post it for more thorough review.
>
That patch had one issue dealing with initting common_pool (it needs
to be initted earlier than it was in the 'best effort' case) -- it's
fixed in this version (formatting, docs, etc still not done, though).
DJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 2 02:11:17 2007