[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [swig/ruby bindings] Adding support for new DEPTH (most APIs) and RECORD_ONLY (merge APIs) parameters

From: Kouhei Sutou <kou_at_cozmixng.org>
Date: 2007-03-24 04:29:11 CET

Hi,

In <20070324030816.GP23378@despot.finemaltcoding.com>
  "[swig/ruby bindings] Adding support for new DEPTH (most APIs) and RECORD_ONLY (merge APIs) parameters" on Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:08:16 -0700,
  Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:

> Kouhei, the recent branch merges into Subversion trunk have rev'd
> quite a few APIs, adding new DEPTH parameters to many (replacing the
> RECURSE flag), and a new RECORD_ONLY parameter to 'merge' operations.
>
> I'd like to add support for these parameters to the SWIG/Ruby
> bindings. I have a patch providing an example of how to do this for
> diff() in a backwards-compatible fashion, and I'd like your direction
> on whether you think this is an appropriate approach. The sample
> patch is attached.

Thanks. I understand what we need to do. I'm working on
supporting symbols since new in 1.5. I'll commit codes that
supports depth parameter. But it may not be done soon
because there are many symbols and we need to write new
tests.

# I hope that Doxygen outputs SINCE_LIST from @since markup.
# I wrote a patch (Bug 421856) but it's needed more works
# for what I need.

Thanks,

--
kou
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Mar 24 04:29:28 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.