Re: SVNParentPath Revisited

Cliff Stanford wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
>>> If it's desired that the repository basename be available to XSLT
>>> presentation layers, then let us make it available using a new element
>>> or attribute. I feel this would be far cleaner than overriding an
>>> existing concept with an additional meaning.
>
> OK. Sounds good to me. I shall prepare a patch to that effect.
>
> Does anyone care if the DTD changes as it's internal to the document?

I'd say the important thing is that the XML remain compatible with
existing XSL transformations.

So, that means you're pretty much free to add attributes at will, free
to add elements with a little care, and probably can't make any other
kind of change, at least without some very careful thought.

Max.