[Blair Zajac]
> Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> >Those two are orthogonal. Do you _really_ need the technical part if
> >you've already established a non-technical policy?
>
> Policy is just policy, it doesn't enforce anything. We could have a
> policy that nobody but committers is allowed to commit to our repository
> and not have any authz, but we don't do that.
That's a poor example, since we're actually talking about people who
are already trusted in the sense that they have read/write access.
People who can be kicked out, or fired, if they misbehave. A better
example would be: "We could have a non-technical policy that certain
committers are only allowed to commit in certain areas, documented in a
file like COMMITTERS, and _not_ enforce it with authz."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 15 22:35:11 2007