Re: merge tracking: rejecting commits from svn clients < 1.5

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, John Peacock wrote:
> Alan Barrett wrote:
> >No, svn+ssh:// is not morally equivalent to file:// access. It does
> >not require a local account to be associated with the ssh key.
>
> I didn't suggest that a *different* local account was required for each
> ssh key, but rather that *a* local account was required.

Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were trying to use the
presence of a local account as a difference between apache and svn+ssh,
but of course apache also requires the mod_dav_svn process to run as a
local user that has access to the files that make up the backend of the
repository.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Feb 13 17:34:21 2007