[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r23221 - in branches/fs-atomic-renames: . build build/ac-macros build/generator build/generator/swig build/win32 contrib/client-side contrib/client-side/psvn contrib/client-side/svn2cl contrib/hook-scripts contrib/server-side contrib/

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-01-28 22:46:43 CET

On 1/28/07, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/28/07, Paul T. Burba <ptbsvn@adelphia.net> wrote:
>
> > Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > > On 1/24/07, pburba@tigris.org <pburba@tigris.org> wrote:
> > >> Author: pburba
> > >> Date: Wed Jan 24 13:16:05 2007
> > >> New Revision: 23221
> > >>
> > >> Log:
> > >> Merge r21513-23186 via svnmerge.py from trunk into the
> > >> fs-atomic-renames branch.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Wasn't rebranching easier?
> >
> > Hi Erik,
> >
> > svn/branches/fs-atomic-renames was recreated by rooneg in r18692, but he
> > merged up to trunk many times after that, the last time being r21513 back
> on
> > 9/15/06. Since I was taking a look at the branch I thought there was no
> harm
> > in catching it up with trunk.
> >
>
> I think he was suggesting that it would have been easier to just delete the
> branch, create a new one from the current trunk, and then apply the diff of
> the old branch and the revision of trunk it was last merged with.

Yep. That's what I was asking.

> You somewhat lose the history when you do this. If you look at the current
> branch, Garrett did something similar a while back.
>
> Since you have already merged, it doesn't matter.

Exactly. Just a thought about different ways one can update a branch.

Bye,

Erik.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jan 28 22:47:00 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.