Re: changelist feature -- keep it? tweak it? scrap it?

Karl Fogel wrote:
> On 1/18/07, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
>> Implicitly severable WCs have to go. Especially after implementing
>> Merge Tracking, I am convinced that we need centralized meta data
>> storage for the WC (in the spirit of Dave Anderson's "Another working
>> copy library" email). We can certainly provide an explicit
>> sub-command to break off portions of the WC, maintaining the feature
>> desired by Justin.
>
> +1 all over that, for both severability and portability.

Yeah, as one probably of the loudest proponents of severability, I'm
willing to resort to the likes of an 'svn sever' type explicit action if
(since) it means such apparently fantastic performance and
simplification gains.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand