[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Hide internal data in svn_wc_entry_t struct

From: Madan U S <madan_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-12-28 09:54:18 CET

Sorry about top-posting.

> Do you mean use name "baton" or use baton syntax with "void *"?

Both.

void, because, introducing svn_wc_entry_private_t still leaves space for ABI revving, when we have svn_wc_entry_private2_t.

the word 'baton' because this would mean wc specific baton containing wc specific information... and the term is pretty well-known in svn-dev-land.

Regards,
Madan.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:chemodax@gmail.com]
Sent: Thu 12/28/2006 2:11 PM
To: Madan U S
Cc: svn-dev
Subject: Re: Hide internal data in svn_wc_entry_t struct
 
On 12/28/06, Madan U S <madan@collab.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ivan Zhakov [mailto:chemodax@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thu 12/28/2006 1:50 PM
> > To: svn-dev
> > Subject: Hide internal data in svn_wc_entry_t struct
> >
> > Some data in svn_wc_entry_t is local and valuable only for libsvn_wc.
> > One of this exampe is new field keep_local which I've to introduce due
> > implementing svn rm --keep-local.
> > And I don't see reasons to publish such data and maintain it using ABI
> > policy, revv and etc.
> > So my idea is introduce private structure to store such data:
> > In include/svn_wc.h:
> > typedef struct svn_wc_entry_private_t;
>
> Sounds like a good candidate for a baton....
>
Do you mean use name "baton" or use baton syntax with "void *"?

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Thu Dec 28 09:57:44 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.