On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 10:16:02PM -0500, David Glasser wrote:
> On 11/28/06, malcolm@tigris.org <malcolm@tigris.org> wrote:
>
> >+ if (!APR_PROC_CHECK_EXIT(exitwhy))
> >+ {
> >+ failure_message = svn_stringbuf_createf(pool,
> >+ _("'%s' hook failed (did not exit cleanly: "
> >+ "exitwhy was %d, exitcode was %d). "),
> >+ name, exitwhy, exitcode);
>
> Is somebody reading this actually going to know what an exitwhy is?
> Maybe it would even be better to say apr_exit_why_e instead (which is
> at least better Google fodder)?
>
Good idea, r22568. I was toying with the idea of specialising that
message even further, where possible ("killed by signal 15", for
example), but I thought that was probably overkill for one thing, and
not particularly portable for another.
Regards,
Malcolm
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Dec 5 01:58:11 2006