Re: svn commit: r22198 - branches/incomplete-directories

On 11/3/06, Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> wrote:
> First, I don't think "immediates" sounds good, though it is at least
> fairly clear in meaning. Even the already rejected "onelevel" from
> LDAP sounds better.

I'm fine with just about any name change, since those are trivial
to implement at any stage during the development of the feature.
(The semantics were my main concern here.) I'll let a few other
names float up and then we'll settle on one.

> Second, did you mean to replace depth:0 with depth-empty there? (The
> same applies to a few other places in the document.)

Well, I think so. The change from "0" to "empty" should be just
a name change -- the semantics of that depth haven't changed.
It's the depth:1 splitting into two new depths that's the complex
thing here...

> Third, I seem to recall that your branch code hints at a fifth possible
> depth, -1 "missing". Do you still plan to implement and expose this
> functionality? It sounds useful to me.

So far that's for internal use only, not meant to be exposed to the
user. Thus, I don't know what functionality you had in mind :-).

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 3 14:21:16 2006