On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Mark Phippard wrote:
...
> We have been in the process of moving the Subclipse project to Eclipse.org
> and making it an official Eclipse project. As part of this process we
> have had to undergo a legal review of all of our code by the Eclipse
> Foundation lawyers. Since we rely on JavaHL, this also means Subversion
> code has to be reviewed by the lawyers. We were told upfront there is no
> chance they will accept Neon because it is LGPL. I told them about Serf,
> which would be OK. For me, this means I'd just have to make my own Win32
> binary builds using Serf since that is not how the "official builds" are
> currently made.
...
Hmmm. Mark, what sort of timeframe does a Neon-replacement need to be
available in? If it needs to happen before Subversion 1.5.0 is
released, you may want to propose some of Justin's fixes for backport
to the Subversion 1.4.x line.
- Dan
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Thu Oct 19 23:45:55 2006