Re: [merge-tracking] points of improvement in mergetracking sqlite db design
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >> Yes, so?
> >> when you delete it, you will get a property delete, and we will mark
> >> the megreinfo as having changed in that revision, with a now empty
> >> mergeinfo.
> >I remember you were saying eventually we will move out of
> >'svn:mergeinfo' prop for merge history tracking.
> I said some people would like to do that. I have no personal plans to
> implement it :)
For the record, "some people" includes me. I've had too many bad
experiences with needing to keep redundant data in sync between
multiple data stores to want to add such a thing into a new system.
Received on Mon Sep 11 22:06:06 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev