[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Revision dates in URLs

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-08-29 17:24:48 CEST

Jonathan Gilbert wrote:
> At 02:22 PM 28/08/2006 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Nilton Volpato wrote:
>>> Index: subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c (revision 21264)
>>> +++ subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c (working copy)
>>> @@ -730,9 +730,24 @@
>>> }
>>> else /* looking at non-empty peg revision */
>>> {
>>> + char *rev = path + i + 1;
>>> + int rev_len = strlen(rev);
>>> + char *unescaped_rev;
>>> +
>>> + /* if rev.startswith('%7B') and rev.endswith('%7D') */
>>> + if ( rev[0] == '%' && rev[1] == '7' && rev[2] == 'B' &&
>>> + rev[rev_len-3] == '%' && rev[rev_len-2] == '7' &&
>>> + rev[rev_len-1] == 'D' ) {
>> Eek! There's no bounds-checking, so the patch can read off either end
>> of the string. Remember, not all input to this function is URI-escaped
>> URLs -- could be regular ol' system paths, which quite possibly can be
>> named just "%".
>
> Actually, if you look closely, this code is very clever:
>
> - If the string is 0 bytes long, then "rev[0] == '%'" will fail, and none
> of the other checks will run.
> - If the string is 1 byte long, then "rev[1] == '7'" will fail, and none of
> the other checks will run.
> - If the string is 2 bytes long, then "rev[2] == 'B'" will fail, and none
> of the other checks will run.
> - Therefore, if you actually make it to the "rev[rev_len - 3] == '%'"
> check, you know that rev_len is at least 3.
>
> There would be a small issue if it were, say, a quote character being
> checked, such that the start & end character would be the same and a string
> with only one character would pass both the starts-with and ends-with
> tests, but since the left brace ends in 'B' and the right brace ends in
> 'D', a string fewer than 6 bytes will never pass this test.

You are, of course, completely correct. And I did, of course,
completely brain-O on this.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Tue Aug 29 18:04:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.