"Garrett Rooney" <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> On 8/24/06, Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net> wrote:
>
>> > and since this is a UI thing with no clear answer Brane can just as
>> > reasonably respond with "no, I disagree, you're wrong". There is no
>> > way to win this argument in a reasonable amount of time.
>>
>> I don't want to win it. I want to reach a mutually acceptable
>> conclusion, and happen to think that my viewpoint has sufficient
>> supporting factual grounds to make it a serious possible outcome.
>
> Whatever. I've stated my opinions multiple times, and you still are
> missing the point. Go argue about your useless little issue, just
> please try and keep it from dealying the release even more than it
> has. Some of us would actually like to USE 1.4.0 sometime this
> century.
Ur. Sigh. I'd like to see 1.4.0 too, but why pile on Max like this?
Even late in a release cycle, there's still a big difference between a
bikesheddy bugfix question, and a bikesheddy option name question.
The former is not an interface for which we will have to maintain
compatibility, the latter is.
If you want to complain about something, complain about the fact that
there's no good way to resolve the issue. But please don't complain
about Max's timing; this was Max's last chance to head off what he saw
as a poor choice of option name. I don't blame him for asking the
question, impending release or no.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 25 01:23:56 2006