Re: defining 'core' subversion (was Re: maintaining a list of svn: revprops)

On 8/19/06, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> On 8/19/06, Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> wrote:
>
> > > Stuff in tools/ *is* in the main source tree, and is a supported part
> > > of Subversion.
> >
> > make install still doesn't install them, right? That makes
> > tools/ a ghetto. I feel the same way about the bindings.
>
> Ooh. Now that's an interesting criteria. I have to admit, the fact
> that all the C-language svn* binaries get installed makes them feel
> much more 'official' than anything in tools/.

+1, if it gets installed via 'make install' it seems more "real" to me.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Aug 19 18:27:47 2006