Re: [PATCH] Infrastructure changes for incomplete directory support.

Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Karl Fogel]
>
>>Well, I don't really know how widespread the WebDAV concept of depth
>>is using the WebDAV names. I had thought "depth zero" and "depth
>>one" and "depth infinity" *were* pretty much how the world refers to
>>these different depth behaviors... Or at least, that those were the
>>closest thing we have to standard terminology.
>
>
> LDAP has the same concept, where a search has a "scope" of either BASE,
> ONELEVEL or SUBTREE. Apparently LDAPv3 also has CHILDREN, I'm not sure
> how that's different.

There ya go, Karl -- names for your marshaled depths: "base", "onelevel",
and "subtree". Also, you could use "exact" instead of "base" -- they are
synonyms in LDAP-land.

(CHILDREN is just SUBTREE minus EXACT.)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand