Hmmm, I suppose I thought that developers would just as easily flock to java
as they would to python or ruby or c, and there already exists some way to do
this. Is javahl the only approach within the svn project itself?
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Mon 7/31/2006 9:34 PM
To: Dan Pozmanter
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; Daniel Rall
Subject: RE: Java Question
"Dan Pozmanter" <email@example.com> wrote on 07/31/2006 09:20:30 PM:
> (Basically, would the idea be to patch in add and commit in the same way
> and cat are implemented? It seems like this might require changing the
> and it is the nature of those two functions that allow them to work
within the client
> Are there any plans to implement the repository, core, or fs api's in
I think that any changes to JavaHL will largely be driven by request.
There is no effort under way to just expand the API without anyone asking
to do so. It would certainly start making it more complex and remove some
of the "High Level" aspects to it. That does not mean there is not room
to add some other features that make sense. I'd like to see some of these
added to JavaHL if you want to work on a patch.
Received on Tue Aug 1 03:39:50 2006