On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:52:35AM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> On 7/15/06, David Anderson <david.anderson@calixo.net> wrote:
> >While we're at it, any problems with APR 0.9.12 ? That's what I'm
> >rolling in the unix deps tarball.
Dave: +1 to using 0.9.12.
>
> Wait a minute, how does the version of autoconf you're using have
> anything to do with APR's config.layout problem? Are you running
> buildconf for APR or something? Or was APR's release built with a
> bogus autoconf version? I'm confused... We shouldn't be touching
> APR's configure at all, it should come right out of the tarball. Or
> does the top level configure somehow matter?
>
Apparently we re-roll APR's configure. 0.9.12 is built with libtool
1.5.20 and autoconf 2.59, but we regenerate it.
No, I don't think we should really be doing that either.
Regards,
Malcolm
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jul 15 15:29:49 2006