Hi,
Pl. note that the following change is in the merge-tracking branch.
[[[
Correct footnote number in notes/merge-tracking.txt
(In branches/merge-tracking)
* notes/merge-tracking.txt:
(As for what is stored): ascii vs binary is discussed in footnote number
2.
]]]
Regards,
Madan.
Index: notes/merge-tracking.txt
===================================================================
--- notes/merge-tracking.txt (revision 20444)
+++ notes/merge-tracking.txt (working copy)
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
others, it seems the human editable *format* of how svnmerge stores
merge information (IE pathname and list of revisions) is fine. Binary
storage of such information would buy, on average, a 2-3 byte decrease
-per revision/range in size over ascii[1], while making it not directly
+per revision/range in size over ascii[2], while making it not directly
human editable.
As such, i have chosen to represent the revisions we have merged *into*
Correct footnote number in notes/merge-tracking.txt
(In branches/merge-tracking)
* notes/merge-tracking.txt:
(As for what is stored): ascii vs binary is discussed in footnote number 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 6 11:52:18 2006