Re: Should we ship a newer version of APR with 1.4.0-rcNEXT?

Quoting Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com>:

> On 7/4/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> > So, Subversion 1.4.0-rc1 was built with APR 0.9.7. Given the bugs fixed
> > in APR since 0.9.7, should we consider building the next -rc with a
> > newer version (0.9.12?)
>
> Given that APR should be backward compatible, why not always ship with
> the newest?

The current RC1 doesn't even work on Windows, because the included neon-0.25.5
doesn't support apr 0.9.7, so either we upgrade apr or we downgrade neon to
0.24.7. See these mails for more info:

http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-06/0264.shtml
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-06/0845.shtml (my report)
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-06/0718.shtml (Paul Burba's report)

Lieven.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 4 16:17:44 2006