Re: svn 1.3.1 merge bug

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Daniel Rall wrote:

> On Thu, 18 May 2006, Thomas B�rkel wrote:
>
> > HI!
> >
> > When a merge brings a new file and this file is already existing, versioned
> > and non-emtpy at the destination wc, the merge command prints "A" as status,
> > but the file is (correctly) conflicted.
>
> Thomas, the problem here is that the status is "A" instead of "C"?
>
> Is the content of the file from the "left" side of the merge different
> from what's in the WC? Is the file is binary or non-binary? What
> version of Subversion are you using?

Oops, 1.3.1.

My question about the file being binary is in part because what you
describe sounds like a bug which was recently fixed for 1.4:

  http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2403

-- 
Daniel Rall