Re: [Show][Show] Re: svn commit: r19660 - in branches/merge-tracking: notes subversion/include subversion/libsvn_subr

Daniel Berlin writes:
> Daniel Rall wrote:
> > How about SVN_MERGE_RANGE_SINGLE_REV (or SVN_MERGE_RANGE_ONE_REV or
> > SVN_MERGE_RANGE_REV) and SVN_MERGE_RANGE_SPAN as alternate names?
>
> Sure, whatever.
> > Do we have to name this union, or can it be completely anonymous?
>
> Anonymous unions are not C89 :)
>

What about getting away with the union altogether and just let the
start and end revs be equal if the range is one revision long?
Or are you planning to extend the union?

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 18 10:08:08 2006