Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> Stefan Küng writes:
> > Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > > On 5/16/06, Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> > >> So we branched 1.4.x a little while back, are there any plans for
> > >> actually tagging a release candidate off of it? If so, when? I'd
> > >> like to roll a version of it up on svn.collab.net for testing purposes
> > >> (specifically to try out the new bdb 4.4 stuff), but historically we
> > >> haven't done that until there's actually been a release candidate
> > >> tarball.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I thought that our typical process was to release an rc1 tarball
> > > for testing right after branching...?
> >
> > Not sure if this should hold up an RC, but I think this one is pretty
> > serious and should be fixed soon (it may not affect the CL client that
> > much, but it does TSVN a *lot* because we rely on this to work).
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=115783
> >
> (This is svn log path@BASE failing, BTW.)
>
> If it is a regression, it should definitely block the release. Would you mind
> filing an issue with the 1.4 milestone so it doesn't get forgotten?
I think it is a regression.
Filed as issue 2550:
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2550
btw: the issuetracker needs to have an "1.4.x" version tag.
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 16 21:48:26 2006