Re: [PATCH]: Was [PROPOSAL] Takeover Take 2

On Sat, 06 May 2006, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > This is useful behaviour, and I think it's exactly the right
> > behaviour for something labeled "checkout --force", but it should
> > not be labeled "takeover".

> The only place that it bleeds into what the user sees is in the output
> of the checkout command. Paul proposed we used a 'T' to show when
> a file was taken over. This would still be appropriate even if a
> separate command was created someday, because in terms of that single
> file that is being represented in the output, that is what happened.

OK. I withdraw my objection.

--apb (Alan Barrett)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun May 7 11:20:09 2006