Re: Reporting subtree deletes through svn_delta_editor_t?

On 4/21/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:

> The problem occurs when we see a deleted directory, because we don't
> get any detail about what the contents of that directory were. So if
> we have a file /A/B/x and we delete /A/B, we'll only see the following
> calls to the editor:
>
> open_directory A
> delete_entry B
> close_directory A

I apologize for the ignorant question: why is this a problem? I sort
of like the terse output. I always get annoyed when I run 'svn rm
somedir/', and then 'svn status' shows me every single child as
deleted. Was it decided long ago that terseness is bad, and universal
verbosity is the goal?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 24 16:49:54 2006