"David James" <email@example.com> writes:
> On 4/20/06, David Abrahams <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> We're having this previously-reported problem building the swig Python
>> buildings for SVN 1.3.0
>> and we're reluctant to roll back to an earlier version of SVN. Can
>> anyone suggest a patch we can apply to 1.3.0 that will get us around
>> this problem?
> (I've cc'd the users@ list, because this question is more appropriate
> for the users@ list than the dev@ list)
> David, could you provide us with a little bit more information about
> how you are building Subversion? Please start from a fresh tarball and
> list all the commands you run from there.
This is from my sysadmin, Andrey Levochkin [andrew-at-stlport.com],
who was doing it:
Well, I did:
and get a lot of errors.
After opening subversion tarball again everything went smoothly - it
means that 'make clean' is not working as it should :(
Please email him directly if you have further questions about the
> I'm guessing you might have run autogen.sh without the release flag,
> thus accidentally switching to developer mode without clearing out the
> pregenerated release mode headers.
I seriously doubt Andrey used autogen.sh.
> In general, users building from
> tarball should never run autogen.sh. I recommend you start from a
> fresh tarball and build and configure from scratch without touching
> autogen.sh at all.
> We should probably patch Subversion so that users who accidentally run
> autogen.sh without clearing out the release mode headers get a clear
> error message so that they will know how to avoid it. I'd be very
> happy to help out if anyone is interested in fixing this.
I don't think you have to worry about that. The first thing most
users will do is look for a configure script and try to use that.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Fri Apr 21 17:31:54 2006