[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Branching for 1.4

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2006-04-07 19:12:00 CEST

On 4/6/06, Peter N. Lundblad <peter@famlundblad.se> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is now 3 months since we released 1.3.0 (and six months since we
> branched). I think we have enough on trunk to warrant branching for
> 1.4. Below is a list of some things that come to my head, others
> could probably fill in more.
>
> diff/merge/blame can ignore whitespace and eol-style only changes.
> svnsync/replay
> svnserve is a real service on Windows.
> wc replacements, bug fixes.
> Lots of client bug fixes in diff (referring to malcolm's work)
> wc propcaching and other speed and space improvements
> svndiff1 format
> The -c option to diff and merge (minor, but anyway)
> The sws feature (http://www.red-bean.com/sws)
> Use switch instead of recheckout when changing URLs of svn:externals.
> bdb 4.4 support (if it doesn't go into 1.3.x)
> Experimental serf support.
> svn diff --summarize
>
> So, I'm proposing to branch in two weeks, meaning April 21. The
> reasons I want to wait for two weeks is for people to have some time
> for stuff they want in before branching. (I, for example, have some
> things that will affect the WC format that I want to get into
> 1.4. I'll post separately about that.) Note that branching doesn't
> mean that we release an RC immediately, so the door won't be closed at
> that date.
>
> If we branch at the proposed date, then give it some weeks to
> stabilize before RC, some more weeks for RC trouble (which we can hope
> we don't have:-) and a month for soak. Then, we might release in late
> June, making us roll 1.4.0 about 6 months after 1.3.0. Given the list
> of improvements and the timing, I think starting the release process
> soon is appropriate.
>
> Any opinions about this?

The one remaining issue I think needs to be resolved is the questions
about providing some mechanism for limiting access to thinks like
ra_replay (svnsync). I'll send another email about this later today,
but I really do think we need to have some sort of story for this
before 1.4.x is branched.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 7 19:12:36 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.