Re: [PATCH] libsvn SONAMEs and APR

On 3/31/06, Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> wrote:
> If the status quo means, as you argue, that Subversion already
> explicitly supports apr 1.x, then you have already broken the promise
> or expectation of binary compatibility for libsvn_*. That being the
> case, I do not see an additional evil in doing it again, assuming (as I
> have argued) that there are solid technical reasons to do so.

That's not true. We have explicitly decided in the past that the
binary compatibility only matters for the Subversion code we
distribute - not any of the dependencies or how they present
themselves in the Subversion ABI. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Apr 3 19:06:10 2006