[Peter N. Lundblad]
> Does this mean r18924 should be proposed for backport together with
> the other swig 1.3.28 proposals and nominated for 1.3.2?
Yes (I've already added it to our Debian builds), but I'd wait before
voting +1 until someone figures out why svk breaks
(http://bugs.debian.org/356894). clkao and I are both trying to find
time to look at this. Unfortunately, I'm not very qualified, not being
an expert in either libsvn or swig, so I can't promise much.
Received on Fri Mar 17 22:48:10 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev