[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: ra_serf update

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-03-14 17:33:45 CET

"Justin Erenkrantz" <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:
> I'm planning to complete the regression tests and then come back to
> see if we can get more performance and lower the memory footprint
> further. We may be able to do a 'Depth: 1' PROPFIND per directory
> instead of PROPFIND per file; this matches how ra_dav used to do it.
> Our memory footprint is roughly equal to the pipeline depth. I think
> the higher CPU usage has somewhat to do with the higher memory
> footprint. But, the overall performance is close enough that I want
> to focus on the regressions now.

Sure, sounds like sensible priorities. If ra_serf is already
competitive even without any dedicated optimization work, then when
you really turn your attention to performance I'll bet there'll be a
lot that can be improved.

> HTH. -- justin

It did!

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 14 19:22:39 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.