* Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> [2006-03-10 12:05:42]:
> So it seems like this has broad support, which is nice. I do realise
> that there was some ambiguity in my proposal of today as a target for
> merging the changes in STATUS (due to the combination of the imprecise
> phrase 'end of next week' and sending the mail on Sunday night).
>
> Anyway, regardless, we have merged some good fixes into 1.3.x since then,
> and theres only a few core fixes remaining unmerged, though it would be
> good to get them in (and the changes to contrib/tools as well).
>
> I realised that we're currently missing an RM for 1.3.1 (no, I'm not
> volunteering :-)). David, after your success with 1.3.0, were you
> planning on being the RM for 1.3.1 as well? [I'm not being entirely
> presumptous - you didn't run screaming when the idea was brought up on
> IRC :-)].
When I volunteered for RM, it was with the understanding that I'd
continue unless stated otherwise. So, yeah, if that's okay with people
(ie. if I didn't do a too shabby job last time), I'm happy to RM for
1.3.1 as well. And as I'm a little tied down in some non-svn stuff at
the moment, this'll give me a chance to contribute, even in non-code
form :-).
So, if you are satisfied with the state of the release branch, I can
get an RC out the door this weekend. If not, I can help review stuff,
or if you need more time to finalize things, just ping me when you're
ready.
Uh, actually, when you say "RC", what do you mean? My understanding
was that for patch releases, there wasn't a soak + multiple RCs before
release. Am I mistaken?
- Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 10 13:53:30 2006