[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why we have NULL txn_id for delta representation?

From: Max Bowsher <maxb1_at_ukf.net>
Date: 2006-03-09 13:03:11 CET

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> Hi,
> I could see all 'delta' representations having TXN as 0. I could see the
> code of subversion/libsvn_fs_base/reps-strings.c@18787:line 1544 causing
> this behaviour.
>
> Can someone clarify.
>
> P.S I could see the mention of Representation's TXN acting as a kind of
> mutablity flag.

Yes, that is correct.

delta reps have no txn_id because they are never considered mutable.

> I think we clone only the 'nodes' entries for the path
> getting changed not the representations, as we put the youngest as
> 'fulltext' so why we need to clone the corresponding representations
> rather we can create new representations.

I totally don't understand that sentence.

Max.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFEEBl/fFNSmcDyxYARAgyuAKDBhjaM8URrlldt6gYLXf+bnF2emACfbyvL
WZm1l0zKnlA2FivClHhmRpU=
=g3Z2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 9 13:04:22 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.