Re: [PATCH] Flush stdout more often

On 3/7/06, Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com> wrote:
> I'm too sleepy to find the right part of the process document to
> quote, but it's my understanding that after someone raises a veto
> (which Justin has clearly done), after a certain period of discussion,

I've been very careful not to mention the 'v' word. I would like to
see us come to a consensus though - as a matter of a last resort, yes,
I would consider utilizing the 'v' word - but I would rather not have
to make that decision.

> the issue is brought to a vote. So there is a way for the patch to
> progress; Justin's concerns simply mean we are more deliberate about
> it.

I don't believe we've called out the process for an override. We've
usually tried to reach consensus before that point. -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 7 10:48:58 2006