Re: [PATCH] Flush stdout more often

Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:

> On 2/10/06, Stefan Haller <haller@ableton.com> wrote:
>
> > Here it is. It's my first patch for subversion, so please bear with me
> > if I did something stupid.
>
> Why would we want to do this? This introduces unnecessary overhead
> for those people who don't care about such things (which is almost
> everybody). -- justin

Justin,

I'm told that this patch won't be committed because no consensus was
reached. Frankly, my impression was that a consensus *was* reached:
many people gave good reasons why the patch is useful, and you stopped
arguing against them. But apparently that's not what people call
"consensus" here, so I'm unsure how to proceed with this issue.

Do you still object to the patch after everything that was said in this
thread? Does it help if I collect some timing data of some sort? If
so, what exactly would be useful?

-- 
Stefan Haller
Ableton
http://www.ableton.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org