Re: svn commit: r17872 - branches/1.3.x

Hi Malcolm,

In <20051227010125.GG6933@lorenz.farside.org.uk>
  "Re: svn commit: r17872 - branches/1.3.x" on Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:01:25 +0000,
  Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:06:36PM -0600, kou@tigris.org wrote:
> > * STATUS: Use r17870 instead of r17795, r17811. And move to 1.3.1 section.
>
> > - * r17795, r17811(test case)
> > + * r17870
>
> You probably noticed that I reverted that part of your change in r17876
> (and added the name of your branch instead). I'm sure someone will
> correct me if I was wrong, but as far as I can see, nominations on
> branches still keep the original trunk revision numbers and just mention
> the branch name - I guess because it's easier to review and track if
> we keep using the trunk revision number.

Yes, I noticed this.
I think your fix is right too. I will care about this.

Thank you for fixing, Malcolm.

Regards,

--
kou
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org