Re: Serf and Subversion was Re: DAV is complicated and slow?

On 11/28/05, Marc Sherman <msherman@projectile.ca> wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> >
> > Compile-time option sounds good.
> >
> > The naming thing is a bit wierd... after all, they're both DAV. We
> > just didn't call the first one libsvn_ra_neon :-).
>
> Would it make sense to allow a build with both ra implementations, and
> select using URLs?
>
> IE: http+neon://... vs http+serf://...
>
> And then, the compile time option would just control which one was the
> default handler for plain http://...

+1 - I like having both and picking one as the default.

--
Michael Sinz               Technology and Engineering Director/Consultant
"Starting Startups"                          mailto:Michael.Sinz@sinz.org
My place on the web                      http://www.sinz.org/Michael.Sinz
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org