Re: Rolling rc3 - tarball issue

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Karl Fogel wrote:

> Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > On 11/21/05, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> > > Apparently, we need some official resolution on the issue of what to
> > > name the tarballs, and whether to keep the double tarball (deps and
> > > nodeps) regime.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on naming the "deps" tarball as regular, and make "nodeps" be the
> > > suffixed one.
> > >
> > > I'm +1 on dropping the nodeps tarball entirely.
> >
> > +1 on both of those options, leaning towards dropping the nodeps
> > entirely because I just don't think it's worth the hassle and sticking
> > with the current state of the union can't be that bad.
>
> +1 here too. Nodeps is an idea whose time has not quite yet come.

+1

-- 
Daniel Rall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org