-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mathias Weinert wrote:
>
> To put it in a nutshell, the .swg files were regenerated because
> I changed their source header files, if not changing these header
> files I still get the same compiler errors, doing
> 'make extraclean-swig-pl' before 'make swig-pl' makes it work.
>
> Finally, just a thought about the .swg files: I suppose that it may be
> a problem if I changed some (source) header files and after that only
> the corresponding .swg files are regenerated as this leads to some
> .swg files generated with swig 1.3.24 (if this is the installed
> version)
> and some with swig 1.3.25.
> Wouldn't it be better to say "regenerate all .swg files if at least
> one is out of date"?
This is a good idea. The trick is that this rule needs to apply only in
release mode (i.e. tarballs), and not to development mode (i.e. working
copies), because incremental regeneration saves time for developers.
Max.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin)
iD8DBQFDgbWqfFNSmcDyxYARAv5aAKDZHqPwSfRImhLvZiyglKb5QYJm6gCePT52
gqhwMHlw66Vw90HnMrsZILo=
=lTlE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 21 12:56:45 2005