Re: Is 1.3.0RC2 officially released yet?

On 15 Nov 2005 09:26:35 -0600, kfogel@collab.net <kfogel@collab.net> wrote:

> It's not the number of changes, it's their nature. If the changes to
> 1.3.x since RC2 are not for severe bugs, then they could wait until
> 1.3.1, and there would be no need for RC3. But if they are for severe
> bugs, then an RC3 would be needed.
>
> Here are the significant changes merged into 1.3.x since RC2 was
> rolled from r17100. Do any seem worthy of an RC3 to us?
>
> * r17157 [merge of r17150]
> Fix a bug that caused anonymous write access over ra_svn to fail
> with "Authorization failed" errors.

This fixes a regression from 1.2.x.

> * r17161 [merge of r17149]
> Remove the possibility of a buffer overflow in keyword expansion.

This fixes a client side crash with overly long keywords.

> * r17350 [merge of r17214]
> Fix crashes caused by reentrant calls into the Java bindings, and
> closing an initialisation-time race condition.

This fixes a bug that caused Subclipse to crash when trying to use our
new ASP_DOT_NET_HACK stuff.

Those three alone seem like enough to justify an rc3 to me.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 15 18:25:06 2005