Re: [wc-propcaching]: Cached proprety existence, take two

> No need to clear the entry first. That will just confuse readers.

Actually, you do need to.

It will live on from tmp_entry above.

> How does this work with entries in the old format? (Note that we only
> bump the WC format when we have write access, so we have to be able to
> read the old format.)

It doesn't.
I told you it would fail with the old format, but i can make it work
trivially.

> Isn't this error just the result of an internal inconsistency in this
> file? Should be an assert in that case.

> What is "the working copy" in this case? When we release this, we have
> WCs that cache no properties and WCs that cache these three
> properties.

So you'd rather see "subversion" instead of "working copy"?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 14 23:59:57 2005