Re: eol-style repository normal format: which is it?

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-11-13 20:19:50 CET

On 10 Nov 2005 14:01:54 -0800, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> Someone recently reported that very piece of code as a bug (issue #2433).

Fix committed in r17321.

bye,

Erik.
Received on Sun Nov 13 20:22:07 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marc Sherman: "Mailing list ettiquette (was Re: Easy comparisons between related trunks, branches, and tags)"
Previous message: Tobias Ringström: "Re: [wc-propcaching]: Cache existence of certain properties"
In reply to: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: eol-style repository normal format: which is it?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]