Daniel Berlin wrote:
> This adds an option "-c" (long form --change) that is shorthand for
> "<rev -1>:<rev>", to merge.
>
> The only thing i'm a little iffy on is whether we should add more state
> just so we can tell the user they specified both "-r" and "-c", instead
> of just saying we found multiple revision arguments (which could pop up
> from multiple -c's, multiple -r's, or mixing -c and -r)
>
> The -c option was discussed a while ago, and nobody seemed to object to
> it. They only objected to allowing the same formats that svk allows,
> instead of just the single revision form.
>
> I'll wait a few days for objections or ideas or whatever before
> committing.
Please consider using your shell to resolve issues like this instead of
adding new options to the svn client. E.g. in bash:
$ function rchange { echo "-r$(($1-1)):$1"; }
$ rchange 500
-r499:500
$ svn merge $(rchange 500) $REPO .
...
--John
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 31 03:26:47 2005