On 10/26/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/26/05, lundblad@tigris.org <lundblad@tigris.org> wrote:
> > Author: lundblad
> > Date: Wed Oct 26 07:41:19 2005
> > New Revision: 17032
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/subversion/tests/clients/cmdline/revert_tests.py
> >
> > Log:
> > * subversion/tests/client/cmdline/revert_tests.py
> > (test_list): Make revert_from_wc_root XFail.
>
> Actually, no, that's not the purpose of XFail, as far as I conceive it:
>
> Tests should be marked XFail if a feature currently isn't implemented
> or behaving as it should, but that fact is recognised and agreed upon
> [ie postponing a fix is acceptable].
>
> This test however wasn't present when the wc-replacements branch was
> merged, but the fact that it fails constitutes a regression. In other
> words: it's absolutely not acceptable to XFail.
>
> To ease the pain: I'll be fixing the problem tonight (probably), if
> zhakov isn't working on it...
Sorry, I have personal problems and probably I cannot fix this issue
today. Any way I already have thought on this issue.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Wed Oct 26 15:08:56 2005