Re: Add -c option to merge

Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
> This adds an option "-c" (long form --change) that is shorthand for
> "<rev -1>:<rev>", to merge.

Why not just do it with -r?

More precisely: when a subcommand *requires* two revisions, but is
passed only one, why not just translate that to <rev - 1>:<rev> ?

(Have we already discussed this? It feels vaguely familiar...)

-Karl

-- 
www.collab.net  <>  CollabNet  |  Distributed Development On Demand
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org