Re: Mention reduced tarball in CHANGES or release notes?

From: Daniel L. Rall <dlr_at_finemaltcoding.com>
Date: 2005-10-25 18:19:38 CEST

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Malcolm Rowe wrote:

> I assume that the 1.3.x tarballs will no longer contain the APR and Neon
> trees that were present in the earlier versions.
>
> I know it's not exactly a 'change', per se, but is it worth adding a
> note to this effect to either CHANGES or the release notes?

Definitely. I'd say it's release note-worthy, meaning it should also be in
CHANGES.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 25 18:42:04 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: [PATCH] show help even if some RA modules fail to load"
Previous message: Julian Foad: "Re: Child process start-up errors [was: svn commit: r16891 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_subr]"
In reply to: Malcolm Rowe: "Mention reduced tarball in CHANGES or release notes?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]