On 10/24/05, Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov <chemodax@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> perhaps the other HAVE_SYMLINK bits could be removed? I think it's
> >> better to have the #ifdef code in one place if possible.
> > May be, but don't use wc_speciall variable unless HAVE_SYMLINK defined
> > clearer for me.
>
> I think HAVE_SYMLINK is a hack that should be kept as small as
> possible, it's currently spread out over 4 places in the function.
>
> Perhaps the HAVE_SYMLINK should be moved inside svn_wc__get_special,
> so that windows always returns false? That would speed up all the
> other operations as well as status.
I was thinking about it. Because I am not wc expert I was fear do it,
but if you consider this safe it would be better. (In my company I
have done it in your way)
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Mon Oct 24 00:15:06 2005